-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 3 Jun 2010, at 17:47, daniel wrote:
Thank you Graham for these precious inputs.

Good, I'm glad it was of some use.

On a slightly more general note:

I would recommend that all developers who are currently using AuthKit (or who plan to do so) should read and inwardly digest the statements on this page:

<http://jimmyg.org/work/code/index.html>

in which James lists those of his Python modules that are currently maintained and those which he is personally moving away from:

1. "Currently maintained Python modules:" (the list does not include authkit)

2. "Phasing out of my own projects:
   * Pylons - I'm using Flows ... instead.
   * FormBuild 1 and 2 - use FormBuild 3 instead.
   * AuthKit - I'm using [... other packages ... ] instead."

(note that the URL for AuthKit in the page is incorrect, the domain is authkit.org)

AuthKit sources and the development repository is here:

<https://hg.3aims.com/public/AuthKit/summary>

(last change Fri, 27 Nov 2009 20:43:41 +0000)

Developers should also take careful note that the last release of AuthKit (0.4.5) is pinned to sub-0.6 versions of SQLAlchemy: "SQLAlchemy>=0.5.0,<=0.5.99"

My personal conclusion is that in theory and in practice, AuthKit is no longer maintained (and reflecting that, I have removed the authkit template from Shabti).

James is quite explicit about the caveats --- "you should use my code at your own risk because the probability I'll move on to something different fairly quickly is rather large".

Inevitably, there comes a point at which the best advice to provide to enquirers is: "you should abandon this approach unless you are prepared to maintain the package yourself"

On the #pylons IRC channel, questions on the suitability of AuthKit as an auth'n'auth solution for Pylons apps typically meet emphatically strong deprecations from experienced and mature Pylons developers.

I may have done you no favours at all by seeming to encourage you to continue down what is very likely to be a developmental dead-end.

I fully appreciate the project constraints that bind you but I felt I should make the above as clear as I could, just to avoid any misconceptions.

HTH

- --
Cheers,

Graham

http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghiggins


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEARECAAYFAkwIz4AACgkQOsmLt1NhivzCqgCgy9OJbZwUn/RRWUsxbocpMykb
XGYAnjoFil4scJWUz0wkzeH0P7KEv9WTiQCVAgUBTAjPgFnrWVZ7aXD1AQKgNAQA
4dEc7adXzyz/ONi0qKyLFgYxNfo7l1oa6/AGC6Ff4dOOL6e2XQ2dauftfQTY+mli
Uel3H/YpvK9PDEdkODudZ+GT6O/OepgLnAS0y/41y6VX3VPeS23A7QgQlY9TVSL9
TIRcvzY8pZkOO5bqA5cCCGDcmleDtGAYBHhxlVOExCg=
=luzi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"pylons-discuss" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.

Reply via email to