Hello, Mike et al. On Jun 5, 9:39 am, Mike Orr <[email protected]> wrote: > Repoze.who/what > looks quite extensive but I find it a bit difficult to keep track of > all the parts.
That sounds like a valid concern. I'm trying to make things more clear lately, and hopefully that wouldn't be a problem when the development versions of repoze.who and repoze.what come out. For (potential) users of repoze.who 1.0 and repoze.what 1.0, this might be a good starting point: http://gustavonarea.net/blog/posts/repoze-auth/ > I finally ended up making my own demonstration site > step by step following the various tutorials and application > templates. But I needed to do a hybrid form of LDAP+database auth that > didn't really fit with who's structure, and then I discovered the > repoze.who-LDAP module is unmaintained. I think if I go back to > who/what I'll write my own identity plugin (if that's the right term) > rather than trying to shoehorn my needs into the existing LDAP, > SQLAlchemy, and identity-properties plugins. But my needs are rather > specific and unusual. You may also consider sending some patches for that plugin. I've changed my mind and, although I won't develop it actively anymore, I'm accepting patches now. For example, one of the things you needed back then is available in v1.1a1 (the username alone instead of the full DN): http://code.gustavonarea.net/repoze.who.plugins.ldap/Changes.html#alpha-1-2010-01-03 Cheers, - Gustavo. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
