On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:30:37 -0700 Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote: > > tl;dr: accepting PEP 554 is effectively a C API break, and will force > many thousands of people worldwide to spend many hours wrangling with > subinterpreter support.
For the record, that's not my reading of the PEP. PEP 554 doesn't mandate that C extensions be rewritten to be subinterpreter-compliant. It makes that an ideal, not an obligation. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/RFLPXB4ZD6SA5PS36ZJT6PTMOR6IGNUP/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
