Le Thu, 13 Dec 2012 10:07:34 +0100, Lennart Regebro <rege...@gmail.com> a écrit : > On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote: > > On 12/13/2012 1:06 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote: > >> All in all I would say I would prefer to install this per Python. > > > > Then explicit update requires multiple downloads or copying. This > > is a violation of DRY. If if is not too large, it would not hurt to > > never delete it. > > Yes, but this is no different that if you want to keep any library > updated over multiple Python versions. And I don't want to invent > another installation procedure that works for just this, or have a > little script that checks periodically for updates only for this, > adding to the plethora of update checkers on windows already. You > either keep your Python and it's libraries updated or you do not, I > don't think this is any different, and I think it should have the > exact same mechanisms and functions as all other third-party PyPI > packages.
Agreed. This doesn't warrant special-casing. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
