On 2014-03-10 17:06, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote:
On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:04:08 +0100
"Stefan Richthofer" <stefan.richtho...@gmx.de> wrote:
> Guido famously hates two digit minor version numbers. :)
This is no problem either. Simply switch to hexadecimal numbering ;)
Or wrap around to negative numbers (a minus sign isn't technically a
digit, is it?).
Terrible idea. Would wreak havoc with comparisons. No. Python 3 is all
about Unicode, so the right way to proceed is 3.8, 3.9, 3.:, 3.;, 3.<,
3.=, 3.>, 3.?, 3.@, 3.A.
Let's stick to digits. We could move on to Devanagari or Gurmukhi digits.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
