You forgot 3., and 3.$.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:56 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> > wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:04:08 +0100 > > "Stefan Richthofer" <stefan.richtho...@gmx.de> wrote: > > > >> > Guido famously hates two digit minor version numbers. :) > >> > >> This is no problem either. Simply switch to hexadecimal numbering ;) > > > > Or wrap around to negative numbers (a minus sign isn't technically a > > digit, is it?). > > Terrible idea. Would wreak havoc with comparisons. No. Python 3 is all > about Unicode, so the right way to proceed is 3.8, 3.9, 3.:, 3.;, 3.<, > 3.=, 3.>, 3.?, 3.@, 3.A. > > ChrisA > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/rymg19%40gmail.com > -- Ryan If anybody ever asks me why I prefer C++ to C, my answer will be simple: "It's becauseslejfp23(@#Q*(E*EIdc-SEGFAULT. Wait, I don't think that was nul-terminated."
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
