I'm not a dev, so my comment doesn't have that much weight, but it is possible to stop flooding the mailing list with idle chitchat about something mostly irrelevant and non-productive?
There's nothing wrong with the current Python versioning scheme. Python 4 is not planned for the near future. I don't see anything else worthy of discussion on this topic. Allen Li On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:35:29PM +0000, Mark Lawrence wrote: > On 10/03/2014 22:28, Greg Ewing wrote: > >Chris Angelico wrote: > >>Terrible idea. Would wreak havoc with comparisons. No. Python 3 is all > >>about Unicode, so the right way to proceed is 3.8, 3.9, 3.:, 3.;, 3.<, > >>3.=, 3.>, 3.?, 3.@, 3.A. > > > >And we have all of UCS-4 to play with, so for all > >practical purposes the 3.x line can live forever! > > > >The downside is that we'll get endless complaints > >from jmfauth about the Flexible Version Number > >Representation. :-( > > > > Drat, drat and double drat, you beat me to it :) > > -- > My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what > you can do for our language. > > Mark Lawrence > > --- > This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus > protection is active. > http://www.avast.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/cyberdupo56%40gmail.com _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
