On 10/03/2014 22:28, Greg Ewing wrote:
Chris Angelico wrote:
Terrible idea. Would wreak havoc with comparisons. No. Python 3 is all
about Unicode, so the right way to proceed is 3.8, 3.9, 3.:, 3.;, 3.<,
3.=, 3.>, 3.?, 3.@, 3.A.
And we have all of UCS-4 to play with, so for all
practical purposes the 3.x line can live forever!
The downside is that we'll get endless complaints
from jmfauth about the Flexible Version Number
Representation. :-(
Drat, drat and double drat, you beat me to it :)
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection
is active.
http://www.avast.com
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
