I am happy to put some work into this (and Pablo Galindo in CC offered to pair on it) but it is not clear for me whether the next step is drafting a new PEP or this is just blocked on "re-evaluating" the current one.
If someone can clarify we can put something together. Thanks! On 18 January 2018 at 14:40, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 18 January 2018 at 19:26, Larry Hastings <la...@hastings.org> wrote: > > Would we be adding yet a third argument-parsing function, > > PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywordsWithPositionalOnly()? > > Checking the docs, it turns out PyArg_ParseTupleAndKeywords already > gained positional-only argument support in 3.6 by way of empty strings > in the keyword array. > > Cheers, > Nick. > > -- > Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ > mariocj89%40gmail.com >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
