Not so fast. I think a PEP is still needed. This change has more repercussions than argument clinic, e.g. it affects 3rd party tooling and bytecode.
On Jan 19, 2018 17:00, "Terry Reedy" <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote: > On 1/19/2018 4:49 PM, Mario Corchero wrote: > >> I am happy to put some work into this (and Pablo Galindo in CC offered to >> pair on it) but it is not clear for me whether the next step is drafting a >> new PEP or this is just blocked on "re-evaluating" the current one. >> >> If someone can clarify we can put something together. >> > > My understanding is that extending the current use of '/' has already been > approved in principle. I personally think that this just needs an issue, if > there is not one already, and a PR. I think we need that, or the effort to > produce one, to reveal any remaining issues. > > -- > Terry Jan Reedy > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido% > 40python.org >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
