Kevin Wolf <kw...@redhat.com> writes:
> Am 31.03.2021 um 17:05 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben: >> +respectful. Examples of unacceptable behavior by participants include: >> + >> +* The use of sexualized language or imagery >> + >> +* Personal attacks >> + >> +* Trolling or insulting/derogatory comments >> + >> +* Public or private harassment >> + >> +* Publishing other's private information, such as physical or electronic >> +addresses, without explicit permission > > "Electronic addresses"? No more Cc: in emails without asking for > explicit permission first in each case, especially when looping in > people who are not subscribed to the list? And the same for attribution > in commits (turning informal statements into Reported-by, Acked-by > etc.)? Links to git repositories of other people? > > I'm sure that this is not what was intended, but it's pretty clearly the > implication of what is written here. I'm pretty sure emails used to post to public mailing lists (or used in a dco tag) are considered public pieces of information. I read the above as covering things that are not public such as private email addresses or chat ids and the likes. > (This kind of "bugs" is one of the reasons why I'm not a huge fan of > written rules instead of trusting the judgement of community leaders. > In the communities I am involved in, I can't remember many cases where > they actually helped to resolve conflicts, but I can remember many > unproductive discussions about how to interpret the written text and > what it does and doesn't cover.) Well we don't have to start here ;-) We explicitly try to avoid rules lawyering with the very next statement: This isn't an exhaustive list of things that you can't do. Rather, take it in the spirit in which it's intended: a guide to make it easier to be excellent to each other. -- Alex Bennée
