+1 for map units. Makes much more sense to me and should confuse less.
On 12/13/2014 07:04 AM, Nathan Woodrow wrote: > I think using the projects units makes more sense, Using the layer > units makes things confusing I think, think of having one layer in > degrees and another in meters. > > So +1 for swapping to mean project units. > > On Sat Dec 13 2014 at 4:02:10 PM Martin Dobias <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hi > > Recently I have been working on some snapping improvements (more > about that later) and I have found one slightly surprising thing > about the configuration of tolerances: if the tolerance unit is > set to "map units", it actually means "layer units" - i.e. units > in layer's CRS and not in project's CRS. Recently there was even a > bug report filed for that: https://hub.qgis.org/issues/11634 > > I would like to change the behavior so that the "map units" in > snapping config dialog would mean units in project's CRS. Would > there be any objections? > > Alternatively we could just rename "map units" to "layer units" to > make it less surprising (and eventually add a third option to use > project's units). > > Cheers > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
