+1 for map units, as this removes confusion 2014-12-13 9:35 GMT+02:00 Matthias Kuhn <[email protected]>: > +1 for map units. Makes much more sense to me and should confuse less. > > > > On 12/13/2014 07:04 AM, Nathan Woodrow wrote: > > I think using the projects units makes more sense, Using the layer units > makes things confusing I think, think of having one layer in degrees and > another in meters. > > So +1 for swapping to mean project units. > > On Sat Dec 13 2014 at 4:02:10 PM Martin Dobias <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi >> >> Recently I have been working on some snapping improvements (more about >> that later) and I have found one slightly surprising thing about the >> configuration of tolerances: if the tolerance unit is set to "map units", it >> actually means "layer units" - i.e. units in layer's CRS and not in >> project's CRS. Recently there was even a bug report filed for that: >> https://hub.qgis.org/issues/11634 >> >> I would like to change the behavior so that the "map units" in snapping >> config dialog would mean units in project's CRS. Would there be any >> objections? >> >> Alternatively we could just rename "map units" to "layer units" to make it >> less surprising (and eventually add a third option to use project's units). >> >> Cheers >> Martin >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Qgis-developer mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > > > > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
-- Alexander Bruy _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
