On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:02:57AM +0200, Geo DrinX wrote: > 2016-10-17 10:46 GMT+02:00 Sandro Santilli <[email protected]>: > > > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 01:26:11PM +0200, Geo DrinX wrote: > > > > > Rather, I would see the most important working upstream python > > environment, > > > and the plugin to work in a sand-safe box. > > > > This sounds like a great idea. > > Are you willing to work on a QEP for it ? > > I am just working on it, without any QEP. What it means "QEP" ? ;) > It remembers me the sound of a cartoon...
I've always though RFC would have been better, but for some reason "QGIS Enhancement Proposal" won: https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals > But, if somebody wants to work serioulsly on this issue, it is sufficient > contact me. I think a public live specification document is more inclusive than a personal contact. --strk; _______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
