Sandro, Have a read of the links that Even posted. They don't really side in favour with the idea of sandboxing Python, and that was just plain python not including PyQt4, etc,
https://lwn.net/Articles/574215/ - Nathan On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Sandro Santilli <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:02:57AM +0200, Geo DrinX wrote: > > 2016-10-17 10:46 GMT+02:00 Sandro Santilli <[email protected]>: > > > > > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 01:26:11PM +0200, Geo DrinX wrote: > > > > > > > Rather, I would see the most important working upstream python > > > environment, > > > > and the plugin to work in a sand-safe box. > > > > > > This sounds like a great idea. > > > Are you willing to work on a QEP for it ? > > > > I am just working on it, without any QEP. What it means "QEP" ? ;) > > It remembers me the sound of a cartoon... > > I've always though RFC would have been better, but for some reason > "QGIS Enhancement Proposal" won: > https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals > > > But, if somebody wants to work serioulsly on this issue, it is sufficient > > contact me. > > I think a public live specification document is more inclusive than > a personal contact. > > --strk; > _______________________________________________ > Qgis-developer mailing list > [email protected] > List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer > Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer >
_______________________________________________ Qgis-developer mailing list [email protected] List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
