Have a read of the links that Even posted. They don't really side in
favour with the idea of sandboxing Python, and that was just plain
python not including PyQt4, etc,
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:02:57AM +0200, Geo DrinX wrote:
> > 2016-10-17 10:46 GMT+02:00 Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io>:
> > > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 01:26:11PM +0200, Geo DrinX wrote:
> > >
> > > > Rather, I would see the most important working upstream python
> > > environment,
> > > > and the plugin to work in a sand-safe box.
> > >
> > > This sounds like a great idea.
> > > Are you willing to work on a QEP for it ?
> > I am just working on it, without any QEP. What it means "QEP" ? ;)
> > It remembers me the sound of a cartoon...
> I've always though RFC would have been better, but for some reason
> "QGIS Enhancement Proposal" won:
> > But, if somebody wants to work serioulsly on this issue, it is sufficient
> > contact me.
> I think a public live specification document is more inclusive than
> a personal contact.
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Qgis-developer mailing list
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer