Sandro,

Have a read of the links that Even posted.  They don't really side in
favour with the idea of sandboxing Python, and that was just plain
python not including PyQt4, etc,

https://lwn.net/Articles/574215/

- Nathan

On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 11:02:57AM +0200, Geo DrinX wrote:
> > 2016-10-17 10:46 GMT+02:00 Sandro Santilli <s...@kbt.io>:
> >
> > > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 01:26:11PM +0200, Geo DrinX wrote:
> > >
> > > > Rather, I would see the most important working upstream python
> > > environment,
> > > > and the plugin to work in a sand-safe box.
> > >
> > > This sounds like a great idea.
> > > Are you willing to work on a QEP for it ?
> >
> > I am just working on it, without any QEP.   What it means "QEP" ?    ;)
> > It remembers me the sound of a cartoon...
>
> I've always though RFC would have been better, but for some reason
> "QGIS Enhancement Proposal" won:
> https://github.com/qgis/QGIS-Enhancement-Proposals
>
> > But, if somebody wants to work serioulsly on this issue, it is sufficient
> > contact me.
>
> I think a public live specification document is more inclusive than
> a personal contact.
>
> --strk;
> _______________________________________________
> Qgis-developer mailing list
> Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
> List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
>
_______________________________________________
Qgis-developer mailing list
Qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
List info: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer
Unsubscribe: http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/qgis-developer

Reply via email to