Michael Hunger wrote: > I think we should keep it. I removed it locally and it was much more pain to > do all the SideEffectOf<InvocationHandler> > implements InvocationHandler myself (first I forgot the implements > InvocationHandler). So I reverted the removal. > > For developers writing their own generic side effects/concerns these classes > would certainly help going.
There's that, and having the base class also makes it easier to ask the question "show me all the generic concerns" since all you do is find the subclasses of that, rather than usages of ConcernOf. /Rickard _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
