On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Michael Hunger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh, perhaps not as abstact methods but with an empty default implementation, > so that you can but mustn't implement them > (according to your needs).
Sure... Cheers Niclas _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
