On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Alin Dreghiciu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If we would go for Niclas proposal I'm for empty methods too, but I > would rather go for not having this GenericSideEfect/GenericConcern at > all as I do not see a real plus in having them. > > Regarding the Niclas 3 methods, I'm voting -1 as it will force sharing > the state at instance level instead of method variable in case that I > need such state. E.g. logging the execution time.
There are no problems to have member fields storing the state during the invocation, as if they were local variables. Ok, let's hold it off and wait for a comment from Rickard. He might have some plans. You got a GenericConcern as well... Cheers Niclas _______________________________________________ qi4j-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ops4j.org/mailman/listinfo/qi4j-dev
