James Hunkins wrote: > Below is a log of the capture movie. I can forward the movie to you > directly if it would help - 24k compressed. It shows the activity > very well. Just let me know.
24k? That would be pretty small ;) I guess you mean 24M, but that should be okay for my mailbox, too. > As to your comment about how QDT is design overall - I totally agree > with the concept. You DO know that QDT is YOUR product? ;-) > - when running 'normal' code, run at full speed possible Well, could you define the term "normal code" for me? > Was wondering in this latter case if possibly the polled interrupt > might not be cleared properly when the mouse is moving causing the > system to re-trigger immediately thinking that the last interrupt is > still there? No, the 100% CPU usage has nothing to do with the polled-interrupt whatsoever. When the mouse is moved, the CPU throttle is disabled, nothing more, nothing less. This was a decision made a long time ago and certainly right for the time, with todays CPUs one could think about a permanent throttle for example, but well, that would be work ;-) Marcel _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
