Marcel wrote: >Anyway, let's call it a /QL compatible/ platform of it's own. How about /SMSQ only/ platform of it's MS Windows? :-) Still think interfaces that nobody can access don't make a platform. But surrounded by SMSQ-on-Windows users it looks like I must give up :-) Peter
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Peter Graf
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Urs K�nig
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Malcolm Cadman
- RE: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Norman Dunbar
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Marcel Kilgus
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Peter Fox
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Peter Graf
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Q Branch
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Tony Firshman
- [ql-users] OT: TF website Phoebus Dokos
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Peter Graf
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Peter Graf
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again P Witte
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Timothy Swenson
