In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tony Firshman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>On Tue, 6 Feb 2001 at 19:05:38, Dilwyn Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>.uk> wrote:
>(Ref: <00ed01c09076$7b5850e0$ad075cc3@default>)
>
>>
>>>Yes, it is a great product ... so many people can benefit. I use the
>>>QPC2 style of QL'ing now more than I do 'black box' or derivatives
>>way.
>>>Although I often have both running at the same time. I'm lucky
>>enough
>>>to have a small room stuffed full of gear !
>I solved the problem by installing a large shed in the garden (8-)#
Ah ! Six sheds :-)
>I got a vast box of QL stuff unannounced from a customer. The discovery
>of a Spem boxed QL in there, and getting the network to the Sh..... I
>mean office, working properly has renewed Ben's interest in the QL and
>basic programming.
>
>I suspect many of us may have started getting hooked on programming etc
>via superbasic. Many basics exist on the IBM PC, but they are very
>much in the background, and much less accessible.
Yes, I have always found that used in a structured way that SuperBasic
is one of the nicest programming languages to use.
--
Malcolm Cadman
