> Although the 'QPC2v2 again' thread is getting a bit long, the > discussion has been very interesting and shows that we need both an > emulator and a native hardware way forward. The emulator scene is very > well served at the moment. Let's hope that the future of > Q40/Goldfire/any other SGC successor is as good as the emulator scene. I fully agree with Dilwyn, there's no need for a emulator against hardware discussion but "competition" between thos two ways of doing a better QL will help all of us... Viele Grüsse aus der Schweiz / Best regards Urs König http://mypage.bluewin.ch/QLvsJaguar/
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Peter Graf
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Bill Waugh
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Bill Waugh
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Tony Firshman
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Tony Firshman
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Peter Graf
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Phoebus Dokos
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Peter Graf
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Dilwyn Jones
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Urs König
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Malcolm Cadman
- RE: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Norman Dunbar
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Wolfgang Lenerz
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Marcel Kilgus
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Malcolm Cadman
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Peter Fox
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Peter Graf
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Q Branch
- Re: [ql-users] QPC2v2 again Dilwyn Jones