At 05:58 �� 26/3/2002, you wrote:

>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dexter 
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>>Please understand me, I am not personally averse to this arrangement, but
>>it is very awkward and not transparent, and is also potentially illegal.
>>Now, I trust completely the two current resellers, but people may ask
>>questions, and they're entitled to do so.
>Speaking as one of the resellers I would like to say that I was not really 
>bothered either way about whether the compiled code was sold or not until 
>we discussed it at Eindhoven. Jochen and I have made very little from 
>selling SMSQ/E over the last few years. The bulk of the price went to Tony 
>Tebby and into the cost of manufacturing the manuals and distributing the 
>goods. During the discussion at Eindhoven we decided to continue to send a 
>reduced levy to Tony Tebby, whose return for a lot of work has always been 
>less than he deserved, and we decided on the 'licensed reseller' approach 
>as a way of paying us for the support that we offer.
>
>This approach is not illegal by any means and is exactly the same as that 
>adopted by most major software houses for other platforms - M$ included. 
>No-one can legally sell a copy of Windoze for instance unless they are a 
>licensed M$ distributor and these distributors pass the goods on to the 
>shops and other outlets.

That's not true even if M$ wants you to think so... Dave is absolutely 
right when he says that this approach is ILLEGAL totally... however for the 
reasons I explained to my previous email it is not illegal in our case. To 
further explain: If you prohibit ANYONE to sell an original version of 
SMSQ/E then no one would be able to sell their second-hand software for 
example. I would have to come to you or Jochen give you my SMSQ/E that I 
didn't want any more for this or the other reason and then wait until you 
sold it!. As you can see this is not only illegal but impractical as well :-)

>Our community is very small so adding a distributor level to the process 
>would be unnecessary. You can become a reseller if you wish. Just contact 
>Wolfgang and he will speak with TT on your behalf. Maybe this is a good 
>idea because the US users would have a better contact.

I am here and available for that :-)

>Be prepared, however, to adopt the role of 'bedtime story reader' because 
>a small minority of users seem not to want to read the manual and are 
>happier if you read it to them over the telephone. One called me the other 
>day to ask how to create a second QXL.WIN file on QPC2. When I told him it 
>was on page x of the manual he quite happily said that he had put the 
>manual away, was not at home and wanted to do it right then. Oh well in 
>that case. Are your sitting comfortably,? Then I'll begin........ Once 
>upon a time ......

Hey I have no problem with providing support on this but I don't see how 
many "sales" SMSQ/E would have in the US (apart from the few upgrades). 
That would be just a convenience service to the community rather than a 
"business" :-)

Phoebus

Reply via email to