On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 09:24:13AM -0500, Phoebus Dokos wrote: > 1. The copyright for SMSQ/E is retained by Tony Tebby (Nothing weird here, > just like Linux) > 1. There are (currently) two official distributors of LICENSED binaries and > ONLY official Distributors can SELL SMSQ/E. > 2. The registrar (and only the registrar) is making available the SMSQ/E > sources to anyone that wants them free of charge, provided that the person > sends return postage in form of IRCs and Media for the sources to be put > on. (See also No. 7 for the contradiction) > 3. Any modifications CANNOT be publicised until approved by the registrar > 4. Any modifications/new code that is approved and entered in the source > loses it's copyright from its author and derives the overall copyright > status of SMSQ/E. (In that aspect, modifications from 3rd parties on the > modifications from the 2nd party does not need to include the writer's > copyright message/license but only the SMSQ/E license) > 5. ANYONE CAN create a distribution for his own use from the sources but > cannot give it away to no one free of charge or otherwise > 6. It is STRICTLY prohibited for anyone to make the sources available on > the internet (unless given specific permission to do so by the registrar or > the copyright holder) > 7. It is NOT STRICTLY prohibited (but in any case requires prior approval) > for a PD library/Shareware catalog/Individual to give away the SMSQ/E > sources provided no fee is charged (same as no. 2) > > > Okay that is it.... Please clarify If I got them right or wrong :-)
where the hell did you get all this bullshit from, what are you smoking today? Bye Richard
