On 13 Feb 2004 at 0:03, Phoebus R. Dokos (Φοίβος Ρ. Ντό wrote: > True. In any case I was talking about QDOS (Classic) and Minerva. > Unbelievable as it may seem, there are users that still require full > compatibility with QDOS and SMSQ/e is not an option for them. Why should that be inbelievable?
> I have > talked to a few (one used Flashback that will not work properly under > SMSQ/e AFAIK) Flashback was quite a progmming feat, (very fast), but severely limited in other ways IIRC. I think it interfered with the ALT/Hotkey system. I wonder, if it is only that, whether it wouldn't be possible to set up a simple hotkey to call it up? > and a couple of others running custom QDOS-based software, > that unfortunately cannot work with SMSQ/e either. "custom" often meant pretty dirty; didn't it? Anyway I, for one, would be interested to know why his wouldn't work under SMSQ/E (if you have any info on that). (...) > As far as Peter's choice for compatibility and openess, without getting > back in the same argument, for heaven's sake! Wolfgang
