From: Matthew Soffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :> No, that is exactly why they can _not_ include qmail. They are not allowed :>to distribute modified versions, which means that as security holes are :>found, they can't fix them and distribute their fixed versions. : :Name 1 security hole found in qmail that they would have had to fix. This isn't the point. It is possible that a security hole could be found in qmail. (highly doubtful, but possible). However, if that happened, I wouldn't want Redhat touching the source anyway. --Adam
- Re: Frivolous forking Vince Vielhaber
- Re: Frivolous forking Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: Frivolous forking Mate Wierdl
- Re: Frivolous forking Mate Wierdl
- Re: Frivolous forking John Gonzalez/netMDC admin
- Re: Frivolous forking John Gonzalez/netMDC admin
- Re: Frivolous forking John Gonzalez/netMDC admin
- Re: Frivolous forking John Gonzalez/netMDC admin
- Re: Frivolous forking Adam D. McKenna
- Re: Frivolous forking Peter van Dijk
- RE: Frivolous forking Adam D. McKenna
- RE: Frivolous forking Soffen, Matthew
- Re: Frivolous forking Peter C. Norton
- RE: Frivolous forking Soffen, Matthew
- RE: Frivolous forking Soffen, Matthew
- Re: Frivolous forking Peter C. Norton
- Re: Frivolous forking Vince Vielhaber
- Re: Frivolous forking Peter C. Norton
- Re: Frivolous forking D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Frivolous forking Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: Frivolous forking Russ Allbery
