On 29-Dec-98 14:44:00, Matthew Soffen wrote something about "Re: Frivolous forking". I
just couldn't help replying to it, thus:
> At 01:16 PM 12/29/98 +0100, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote:
>> No, that is exactly why they can _not_ include qmail. They are not
>> allowed
>>to distribute modified versions, which means that as security holes are
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>found, they can't fix them and distribute their fixed versions.
^^^^^
> Name 1 security hole found in qmail that they would have had to fix.
Regards,
/������������������������������T�����������������������������������������\
| Rask Ingemann Lambertsen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Registered Phase5 developer | WWW: http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c948374/ |
| A4000, 775 kkeys/s (RC5-64) | "ThrustMe" on XPilot and EFnet IRC |
| Do artificial plants need artificial water? |
- Re: Frivolous forking Mario Niessner
- Re: Frivolous forking Scott Ballantyne
- Re: Frivolous forking Adam D. McKenna
- Re: Frivolous forking Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: Frivolous forking Matthew Soffen
- Re: Frivolous forking Stefan Paletta
- Re: Frivolous forking Peter C. Norton
- Re: Frivolous forking Vince Vielhaber
- Re: Frivolous forking Peter C. Norton
- Re: Frivolous forking Vince Vielhaber
- Re: Frivolous forking Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: Frivolous forking Mate Wierdl
- Re: Frivolous forking Mate Wierdl
- Re: Frivolous forking John Gonzalez/netMDC admin
- Re: Frivolous forking John Gonzalez/netMDC admin
- Re: Frivolous forking John Gonzalez/netMDC admin
- Re: Frivolous forking John Gonzalez/netMDC admin
- Re: Frivolous forking Adam D. McKenna
- Re: Frivolous forking Peter van Dijk
- Re: Frivolous forking Adam D. McKenna
- RE: Frivolous forking Soffen, Matthew
