Jenny Holmberg wrote:
>
> Ken Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Sir. If your users are on your machines, you can just copy your
> > emails to thier directories. But.. it seems like your users
> > are spread over other peoples machines. Hence.. by definition,
> > you are a spammer, sir.
>
> Please. You have no evidence to show he's a spammer. If the
> newsletters are run properly (i.e. with confirmed opt-in), he is doing
> the Right Thing. Furthermore, he's trying to be a responsible
> net-neighbour and not cause problem to other people's mailservers.
> That is something a lot of maillistserver admins would do well to
> emulate.
I appologize to easily catorgorize this person as a spammer.
Howver, the bulk of email produced on the internet is from
spam sites.
Jenny, how much experience do you have with spam sites?
have you designed, operated and maintained a spam site?
I suggest the bulk of evidence is that a person who askes
this type of question is a spammer.
Not only that.. Everyone who is not a spammer would be
extremly reticent to ask such a question.
I respect his reasonableness for being responsible.
And I respect you trying to defend his actions.
However, he has not shown any evidence that he is,
or is not a spammer.
Shall we all now agreee that anyone who sends out
bulk emails is not a spammer?
I see a lack of evidence that this person is not
a spammer. Why else would a person be sending out
large amounts of emails to non local domains
Ken Jones
