Wayne Chu wrote:
>
> I feel our discussion starts to become OT.
> I tried to be calm and I won't discuss it any more after this.
Obviously this is a hot topic for you.
So, without furthre evidence, you are obviously a person
who will exploit the edge of spam related email.
I have a question for you Sir.
Are you going to be sending these "emails" to your local
list of accounts. Or will this be going out to other
lists?
How have you received these lists of emails?
Ken Jones
>
> From: "Ken Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Ah.. So you are not a spammer, except you assume all your
> > "customers" want your email. Besides that moral issue,
> > do you have measured information about the delivery
> > statistics of qmail version other options?
>
> I said "subscriber", that means we send e-mail to users who
> willingly "subscribe" our newsletters on our web page.
> We don't send unsolicited emails to people who did not
> subscribe our newsletters.
>
> We surveyed other email options. We chose qmail because
> the information we gathered told us that qmail is one of the
> fastest MTA sending outgoing email. And we like the VERPs
> capability of qmail. With it we could effectively eliminate
> expired addresses.
>
> > Are you saying that your country is a pirate economy?
> > Shall I embarrase you and trace your email? or do you wish
> > to reveal which country you are from?
> > Does your country harbor pirates?
>
> If you so insist, I am from Taiwan.
> Here is my company:
> http://www.etwebs.com/
> http://www.etmc.com.tw/
> These pages are writen in Chines language.
> Welcome to give us a little more pageview count.
>
> > Sir. If your users are on your machines, you can just copy your
> > emails to thier directories. But.. it seems like your users
> > are spread over other peoples machines. Hence.. by definition,
> > you are a spammer, sir.
>
> What's your definition of "spammer"?
> If you mean anyone who send large quantity of email on the net,
> regardless unsolicited or solicited. I feel that this classification may
> not be fair.
>
> I don't know why you are so harsh at this issue. Maybe you have
> seen a lot of hateful spammers in your email admin career?
> But I say it again, we don't want to cause any people annoyance.
>
> If you feel discussing mass-mailing techniques on the list will benefit
> or encourage potential spammers. I agree. I did not thought about
> this danger at first. But please don't berascal people (and their country!)
> who just ask questions.
> Thank you.
>
> >
> > Ken Jones
