on 12/7/00 6:36 AM, Ken Jones at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Wayne Chu wrote: >> >> I feel our discussion starts to become OT. >> I tried to be calm and I won't discuss it any more after this. > > Obviously this is a hot topic for you. Seems a little hotter for you. Of the two of you, which is asking technical questions and attempting to be civil, and which is imputing malicious intent and generally ranting? Interestingly, I'd rather read mail like his than mail like yours. - Amitai
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dy... Ken Jones
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dy... Mark Delany
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dynami... Wayne Chu
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dy... Ken Jones
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dy... Jenny Holmberg
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dy... Ken Jones
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dy... Jenny Holmberg
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dy... Ken Jones
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dy... Wayne Chu
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dy... Ken Jones
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dy... Amitai Schlair
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dy... Alex Pennace
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dy... cfm
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dy... David Dyer-Bennet
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mailings David L. Nicol
- Re: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mailings asantos
- RE: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mailings Henry, Casa
- RE: Qmail and Large Scale Dynamic Mailings Collin B. McClendon
