On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:29:48 -0700, Erik Espinoza wrote: > Cool. Very nice. Perhaps if there is some interest, I will develop a > Dovecot qt package, but I don't really see the point. Perhaps you > could help me understand. Are there any particular reasons why you > want to use Dovecot over Courier?
I actually don't have that much experience with Dovecot, but more than Courier. I would vote in favor of using Dovecot for the following reasons: - It is part of the RHEL 4 distribution. It is already installed, and I can trust the source. Patches are automatically available via up2date. (Obviously this is only something that applies to RHEL people, but is important for me.) - It is very easy to configure. - It is _supposedly_ more modular, secure, and reliable than courier. See: http://www.dovecot.org/doc/ Since this is already installed and running, and apparently hooks into vpopmail, I will probably just keep on using it. What about you, any particular reason for me to use Courier (or more specifically, the QT Courier package)? Quinn --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
