My two only wishes (things that I'm really missing when developing) are:
1) Virtual widgets;
2) On demand remote data loading for virtual widgets (like Remote Table)
Those 2 items above are the kind of thing 90% of all projects would
be beneficed by.
Sure much more can be done to complement the framework. But I think the
main role of the core team is to create the foundation, the base, the core
of the framework so the community can contribute something upon that.
For examples, themes: qooxdoo provides mechanisms to customize the
appearance of our app and provides two themes as examples. Something beyond
that should be created by us, the community, just like Petr did.
Tobi has created a great contrib in a few hours. That's great and shows us
how easy it can be when the right tools are available into the framework's
core. But just because it's true for that specific contrib it doesn't mean
it will be true for every other one.
I know the requests I made above are already planned for the future. I just
want you to know what my vote would be for further development since we are
discussing priorities.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Bee Jay <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12 Jun 2010, at 07:02, Petr Kobalíček wrote:
>
> > 3. Better default theme. I like that qooxdoo goes its own way, but the
> > Modern theme isn't really modern (to me) and Classic theme is hideous
> > (mainly the hovering styles, see pushed buttons, focused list box,
> > etc...). Here the ExtJS is clearly winner.
>
> I'm quite satisfied with modern theme, I choose function over look. But I
> think the available widget is still very limited both on number and feature.
> :(
>
> > 4. Finished databinding and unified programming style for all
> > components. Working with table is really different to working with
> > list, etc. I think that qooxdoo in future should contain only
> > virtual-widgets (I'm sure that this is going to happen) and to
> > optimize rendering and remove many DOM elements the <canvas> element
> > will be used.
>
> +10! :D
>
> > 5. Better performance - qooxdoo is really slow compared to other
> toolkits.
>
> Overall, I think it's quite acceptable. But on some widgets (table?) and
> process (drag-n-drop?), the slow performance is noticeable.
>
> -Bee-
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
> lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
> _______________________________________________
> qooxdoo-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
