Op 26-8-2011 13:54, [email protected] schreef: >> I suppose the goal of this exception is to keep source compatibility. >> (forward >> delcaration would break if the namespace change) So I would say yes, >> modules which are meant to keep source compatibility should not have a >> namespace > I agree, that was the goal of the exception. > Is it possible to do both at once: make it possible for these modules to either be used with or without a namespace? If you make an exception now, you will have to make it again for 6. If you make using namespaces the recommended way now for *all* modules, then at least you can be consistent for new code. For Qt 6, non-namespaced modules can then be depricated.
André _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
