Sean wrote: > Why not just have the modules install a .prf file and use that in the CONFIG > variable like we can do now in Qt4? ie > > CONFIG += qtpim
Ossi wrote (about the proposed new MODULES variable): > we can do this renaming, but to make it really symmetrical in all directions > would mean quite some replacing in the existing .prf and module/*.pri files. > not a big deal per se ... > > the problem of optional modules is already kind of solved - just check > whether QT_CONFIG contains the module you want. Do you mean the CONFIG variable that Sean referred to? I don't think it'd be important to rename stuff, if the existing mechanism works. Best regards, Henry _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
