On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 02:22:16PM +0000, ext [email protected] wrote: > Ossi wrote (about the proposed new MODULES variable): > > the problem of optional modules is already kind of solved - just check > > whether QT_CONFIG contains the module you want. > > Do you mean the CONFIG variable that Sean referred to? > no, i mean QT_CONFIG. it contains what you can add to QT.
> I don't think it'd be important to rename stuff, if the existing mechanism > works. > the one thing is a slight asymmetry: QT += gui someotherlib i.e., the current internal modules have no special prefix, and it kind of makes sense to keep that for backwards compatibility. one could keep the QT syntax and also support a new syntax: DEPENDS += QtGui SomeOtherLib QT_CONFIG would need a pendant like AVAILABLE. or we could just move on, indeed ... _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
