On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:38:52PM +0000, ext [email protected] wrote: > > Ossi wrote: > > the one thing is a slight asymmetry: > > QT += gui someotherlib > > i.e., the current internal modules have no special prefix, and it kind of > > makes > > sense to keep that for backwards compatibility. > > one could keep the QT syntax and also support a new syntax: > > DEPENDS += QtGui SomeOtherLib > > QT_CONFIG would need a pendant like AVAILABLE. > > > > or we could just move on, indeed ... > > I'm tempted to "move on" :-) > > I think we should do as Sean proposed: use the QT variable for Qt Essentials,
> and the CONFIG variable for Qt Add-On modules. > huh, no, that doesn't work. the whole module handling we have is bound to the QT variable (and the whole thing is enabled via the implicit CONFIG += qt). in qt4, there is also MOBILITY which is enabled via CONFIG += mobility, but that falls out of the current system. _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
