Henry: > > I'm tempted to "move on" :-) > > > > I think we should do as Sean proposed: use the QT variable for Qt > > Essentials, > > > and the CONFIG variable for Qt Add-On modules.
Ossi: > huh, no, that doesn't work. the whole module handling we have is bound to > the QT variable (and the whole thing is enabled via the implicit CONFIG += > qt). in qt4, there is also MOBILITY which is enabled via CONFIG += mobility, > but that falls out of the current system. Ah ok, the .prf system would require duplicating the module handling... So if there are no drawbacks in using the QT variable for Qt Add-Ons too, then why not do that. Regards, Henry _______________________________________________ Qt5-feedback mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback
