Superleaves ..... those are what get swept up by rakehells ... right? (insert groan here)
Eugene Deon wrote: > > I've been trying to tune my leave estimation strategy by solving for > the exact values of my commonly considered estimation variables as to > minimize the sum of squared errors between my strategy estimates and > all the leaves in Quackle's "superleaves" file. > > So far my variables include only: > -single letter values > -double/triple/quad-letter penalties > -vowel/consonant imbalance penalties > -bonuses for number of tiles in CANISTER > -a couple of letter pair values (QU, YY, IY, FF, ING) > > The results aren't acceptable yet. 21,000 of 148,000 five or fewer > letter racks have errors over 5. But I would like to keep the number > of terms managable if possible. > > Has anyone else done a similar analysis? Are complete details of > Maven's letter pair values available somewhere? > > Thanks, > Eugene d'Eon > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > >
