What is the basis of your computation? Just the predefined Quackle superleaves? or some other algorithm?
I find it hard to believe a lot of these, ABERRS to cite one. surely BARES, or even SEAR, is better than doubled R's. -John VP On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Eugene Deon <[email protected]> wrote: > I computed the subset of maximal superleaves (definition: a leave is maximal > if no amount of deleting letters from it improves its value) > > > > http://www.eugenedeon.com/maximalleaves.txt > > > > Then it's easy to ask questions like: > > > > 1) If I have some letters in CERTAIN and a V, when, if ever, would I keep > the V with those letters when exchanging? > > Answer: not very often (only with these 11 racks) > > > > AEIRTV 14 > AEINTV 14 > EEIRRV 12 > ACEIRV 12 > EEINRV 11 > CEEIRV 11 > ACEITV 10 > AEENRV 7 > AEIRV 6 > AAIRTV 6 > AEITV 4 > > > > Many more lists will be made available when I collect them all in some > navigatable fashion, but I thought this one was cool. > > > > Eugene d'Eon > >
