On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:16 PM, John Van Pelt <[email protected]> wrote: > What is the basis of your computation? Just the predefined Quackle > superleaves? or some other algorithm? > > I find it hard to believe a lot of these, ABERRS to cite one. surely > BARES, or even SEAR, is better than doubled R's.
I can believe it. Another one I found back in the day is CCEHOS. John
