Title: Re: [QUAD-L] Who's the President?
I don't consider that getting on my case because you didn't say anything
rude. You didn't say anything to me belittling by using sarcastic remarks and I
respect that.
Stacy
"People who hate you do not win unless you hate them. Then you destroy
yourself"
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 12:26
AM
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Who's the
President?
Not to get on your case, but
the job surplus was a superficial hiring of extra employees, especially in the
dot.com industries, to cover up creative book-keeping by CEOs milking the
employees' 401s and pensions plans which happened to come to light in March
2000. Neither the cover up or the outing of crooked CEOs was related to
policies of Bill or Geo W. The outing was the consequences of greed go
wild and eventually caught the attention of the SEC.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004
11:07 PM
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Who's the
President?
And there was a surplus when Clinton was in office and more jobs.
And don't blame it on 911 because even before 911 there were more jobs when
Clinton was in office.
Stacy
"People who hate you do not win unless you hate them. Then you destroy
yourself"
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2004
11:46 PM
Subject: Re: [QUAD-L] Who's the
President?
Economics 101. It�s something we all sat
through fighting
to keep our eyes open. But I admire your patience Jim,
for
walking some of us through it again.
I suspect however, that
your patient description on the
process was lost on some of the more
knowledgeable elite
among us who would posture such infinite wisdom in
the
vitriolic castigation a great, gentle and noble man who had
the
vision and determination to neutralize the world threat
posed by the
Kremlin.
History will record his leadership in terms most
laudable,
including �the whole star wars thing.� Really!! And I
doubt
seriously that it matters very much whether or not you
respect
a president that �barries the nation into debt.�
Whatever
that
means.
Boyd
------------------------------------------
On
11/3/04 6:07 PM, "Jim Lubin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 03:33 PM 11/3/2004, Stacy Harim
wrote:
Yea, Reagan put us further into debt by
building up nuclear weapons. Only reason why Russia backed down
because they couldn't afford it. The whole star wars
thing. really!!! I don't have any respect for a
president that barries the nation into
debt.
Could someone please
explain what the big deal is about national debt? I don't get it. The
government gets it's income from taxing the people. When the government
has a surplus it means it's taxing people too much. When the government
is in debt it sells bonds which allow people to invest and have a stake
in the country. Having a debt lowers the value of the US$ which means
other countries can afford to by products manufactured in the US. When
the country had a surplus the US$ was at an all time high against other
currencies and the nation was in a recession. National debt does not
equate to personal debt.
Jim
|
