On 12 Jan 2017, at 18:47, Paul Jakma wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jan 2017, Martin Winter wrote:
similar to what was discussed last year (and blocked by Paul’s
veto) for
Urg, you just can't help spin.
_EVERY MAINTAINER_ had a veto. Further, objections from the wider
community were also usually honoured. *DAVID* vetoed stuff. *YOU* have
objected to stuff and had it honoured. Even after David was suspended,
his objections were still honoured.
Objection against something and a veto are different things. I do
believe everyone should speak up if he thinks
something is the wrong way, but also accept to be overruled by a
majority.
But then you made it clear that this isn’t a democracy or anything and
this is your fork and it’s your
way or the highway.
I'm not claiming the model was perfect - it may have been past its
sell by date.
Anyway, Why are you here Martin? What are you trying to achieve?
Because I care about Quagga and previously didn’t expect to withdraw
my support and work for it.
So basically Transparency and Clarification:
1) Would be good for people to know that they can’t come to me anymore
for Quagga Security Issues.
I think this is now clear, but there are others who got removed too.
Would be good to know who is still
on the list so I can redirect questions.
(BTW: Email to list doesn’t work - it’s seems to all end up on
waiting for a moderator approval. You should
fix this for a list to report security issues)
2) Clarification if you want anyone from NetDEF to stop providing any
help on Quagga. I didn’t expect to
withdraw from it, but it sounds like this is your wish. Happy to comply
and no screaming needed. A simple
email with a clarification would be all that’s needed.
- Martin Winter
_______________________________________________
Quagga-dev mailing list
Quagga-dev@lists.quagga.net
https://lists.quagga.net/mailman/listinfo/quagga-dev
