I disagree too - I have an app which depends on QC actually... On Apr 13, 2013, at 5:32 PM, Gordon Apple <g...@ed4u.com> wrote:
> I disagree with the statement that QC is purely a developer tool. To some > extent, yes. However, we have a new product coming out where we include QC > animated components. We planned on releasing compatible QC templates, which > users could use to add their own personalized effects. If QC goes away, we > will be very unhappy. :-( > > > On 4/13/13 3:49 AM, "Joshua Sophrin" <jsoph...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I could understand this if QC was a >> Consumer product. But as it is purely a developer tool, what technology is >> slated to take its place? > > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list (Quartzcomposer-dev@lists.apple.com) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/info%40cogevj.hu > > This email sent to i...@cogevj.hu Tamas Nagy | Software Developer - CoGe VJ Software www.cogevj.hu | www.facebook.com/cogevj | www.twitter.com/lumabeamerz
_______________________________________________ Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. Quartzcomposer-dev mailing list (Quartzcomposer-dev@lists.apple.com) Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/quartzcomposer-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
