One of the many benefits of FOSS is that users can contribute - even if it's just writing tickets on the issue tracker.
On Wednesday, 15 June 2016 08:11:54 UTC+1, Drew White wrote: > > Hi folks, > > Please, do not take this whole thing the wrong way. > It will seem like it is sounding the way it is not sounding, just because > of the way > it is put together. It's all things that I find need to be looked into, > things that I know > need to be fixed, and that I have fixed on my local. > Hopefully you will understand where I'm coming from and understand this > the way I > intend for it to be understood, and not the way you will most likely take > it. > > > > When will Dom0 be updated to a recent version of something? > > If this was CentOS for Dom0 then there would not be this update issue > where Fedora > removes the packages and repositories for their "obsolete" operating > systems, and > you wouldn't have a useless Dom0 that one couldn't get updates for. > > This is the problem with Fedora. CentOS is heading the same way slowly > after version 7. > > But at least they have long term updates and stable system that doesn't > have > invalid repositories after a few months. > > Please change the way things are done so that they work long term, not > short term. > > Or else have a workaround for things to work properly over a long period > of time. > > Another thing, please get the menu structuring and naming correct, that > way we don't > have to alter your code to make the menus correct. > > With Windows HVM Templates and AppVMs wether they are standalone or not, > why > do you have the menus the way they are? Why not build the tools to build > the menu > correctly instead of us having to edit EVERY menu item to get it the way > it should > have been built? > > Why is the networking so difficult? > I have my DNS server set to the parent virtual (proxyvm or netvm) which > has the main > DNS server as the one that's on the network acting as the DNS server, but > the > virtuals can't find it, unless I specify it explicitly. > > Why is it that the Qubes-Windows-Tools almost never work? > Why is it that the tools never set up the screens right? > Why does it set it up as ONE screen, instead of multiple screens when I > use 2+ monitors? > (This is the reason you are having the issue and bug that you > have with the tools on > large displays) > > When reading https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/1870 > There are some good ideas, and some that aren't really good at all. > > https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/1870#issuecomment-223055937 > If THAT is what the manager will be like, it has no structure, no layout > that is understandable, > it is designed to be "*wanky*" and not *functional*. > > Your current manager needs only altering to work better, and adding onto > it. Not a facelift to > make it look like crap. > > The installer doesn't allow for multiple HDDs to be used. It just decides > that all HDDs are 1 HDD. > If I select the smaller HDD that the O/S is going on, and the drive I want > /var/lib/qubes to go on, > then it sets them up as one hdd and just wants me to assign space. > But that's not what I want. The one that will have the virtuals on it is a > mirrored drive, to > keep my virtuals protected. > I don't want half of the virtual to be on the main drive and the other > half to be on a mirrored drive > because then if my primary drive dies I won't have the first part of the > virtual, only the second. > That's pretty useless to me. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/67e655bd-2013-460e-8653-a2e4f3bc9aaf%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
