Well I'm just a layman but from my little experience i prefer systemd cause its easier to handle running system processes. but from bootup time standpoint it seems to make no diff.
I dunno what it is. I started linux with fedora but itseems it started to get super buggy after fedora19 to the point I switched to debian and ignored the false extra security I thought it gave me. I felt like a bigger target using it for some reason. I thought problems were due to switch to dnf which just made updates unbearable as if some sick joke on fedora users. but all sorts of baremetal problems with it. maybe it was the change to systemd? or Kernels keep getting worse? More people using linux but they don't really use it? lol I dunno I started on Fedora 14 ir 15 not sure when it got systemd actually. Debian is stable and quiet. I made the switch debian. arch can be real lighweight and less buggy but has same kernel probs as fedora. They similar in ways. fedora 22 was nail in coffin for me. Its like let me put a target on my forehead with the word dumb and a bullseye. One good thing it gets updates super fast. Alot of qubes user complaints areabout poor support for cutting edge hardware. Think thats reason qubes uses fedora. I'd rather fedora then ubuntu lmao... I use to use slackopuppy it was great, talk about lightweight. and fully functional. security conscious too. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/fe62f407-f6f1-4ef0-afaf-c30c1d3648ea%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
