On 12/29/2017 06:39 PM, awokd wrote:

On Fri, December 29, 2017 11:32 pm, Ivan Ivanov wrote:
2017-12-30 1:57 GMT+03:00 taii...@gmx.com <taii...@gmx.com>:

Yes, I am also very disappointed in purism, and its still unclear for
me why they went the Intel road, when - at 2013 - they could have created a
more freedom-respecting equivalent of G505S, instead of
This was hashed over in the Coreboot mailing list recently, see
https://mail-archive.com/coreboot@coreboot.org/msg50746.html. To be
honest, I'm kind of tired of hearing about Purism now. ;) I think people
have made their positions clear.
:<
I only make so much noise because no one else is doing so - they have strangely universal positive coverage in the mainstream tech media and the real facts and downsides are never mentioned or investigated - not to mention that the real libre products like TALOS 2 and Novena get little to no press for some reason.

I respect your opinion, but there are still so many laymen who think that "LibreM" means "Libre" (the purism goons say it doesn't and that its not their fault people are confused) so I feel as though I must continue.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"qubes-users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/3a3c692e-b03c-88a2-f56b-ee38a486723f%40gmx.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to