On Friday, 26 January 2018 03:36:33 UTC, Andrew David Wong wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 2018-01-25 12:28, awokd wrote: > > Resuming working my way through splitting up the documentation now > > that the 3.2 vs. 3.3 question has been mostly settled. Some > > general questions: > > > > 1. Should I open an issue for tracking and move the discussion > > over there? Move to qubes-devel? Keep here? > > Please open an issue in qubes-issues. > > (Doing so does not preclude discussion here or on qubes-devel.) > > > 2. The command line tools in particular > > (https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/vm-tools/ and > > https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/dom0-tools/) seem Wrong to try to > > share the same pages for 3.2 and 4.0. Not only is the selection of > > commands slightly different between versions, but many have > > slightly different options ("-a" vs. "a"). I'm thinking of copying > > all the existing pages, appending "4" so they can be linked to > > directly, and putting in their own section. Thoughts? > > Those pages are automatically generated from the man pages stored with > the tools' source code in their own respective repos, so any changes > to those pages in qubes-doc will be overwritten. Changes should be > made to the original files instead. That way, the changes will persist > when the qubes-doc versions are automatically generated. > > I agree that the tool man pages should not be shared between 3.2 and > 4.0 (but they probably wouldn't be anyway, due to the nature of the > system just described). > > > 3. Some of these documents are pretty outdated. Should we have an > > Archive link and move stuff like > > https://www.qubes-os.org/doc/template/fedora/upgrade-18-to-20/ to > > it so it doesn't clutter up the main Docs page? > > > There are two categories of outdated documents: > > 1. Documents that we want updated (but that no one has updated yet). > 2. Documents that are about old topics (but are otherwise good). > > I don't think it would make sense to move documents of category 1 into > an archive section, since that would incorrectly suggest that we don't > want or expect them to be updated. > > The old Fedora upgrade documents fall into category 2. However, it > looks like they (and perhaps the release notes for unsupported Qubes > versions) are the only major offenders visible in the main table of > contents. This is understandable, since a new version of the document > gets added each time there's a new version of the corresponding > software. I think it makes sense to handle these cases specifically, > by creating a page that collects all the versions of each one. I'll do > this now. > > In general, it's worth thinking about whether we even want to keep > severely outdated category 2 documentation around. Does it have any > value anymore, or will it just produce misleading search results? > (Note that it will all remain permanently archived in the git revision > history, so it's mainly a question of visibility on the website.) > > - -- > Andrew David Wong (Axon) > Community Manager, Qubes OS > https://www.qubes-os.org > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEZQ7rCYX0j3henGH1203TvDlQMDAFAlpqojUACgkQ203TvDlQ > MDDG4Q//Q6ND5fzToFv6KKQn4SzkcUSIIZQKtMPTlG9BkC7UCgjFZ+7sxrLA1N5X > H+9Z88+QNRL6FBOa6DHpFZOOA6vomzw0HXkTF+g9VcplsJIFZh6iB7lpSta1XwKU > 1DG+ayF0oDd8PxKtSjaslMWRsr9p9cApPM7G+z6sGLB34LLZfolx19FRhwcpfBBK > 09wyaAzmr5sF9oO8rSxC1llz5u75GatXUu+tHIc3Jh9C4hBtX7MSwyoq7eTkXnKQ > VpS35O8thmhm6cEuyNQsUD7ia853lWRcdTur1Am7GIx3jwl7VBQ6YCqanLRLueaI > tm4LbBfNrZcxFexHp0mB+veDeIfkC4cJZm8/sbjrHEicK6Cuvp5E0E6iLOaMw9gI > y3D1ypbEwMXyYQFPWW0h488pNow9RCrTHTcvBhgyIBw0xhCe0j89RZpbV3UB79k1 > n5YRoj36XXRmHho/KVIlFMrzsXE6q9sawU8P1/Q7mBjX3fQLDoOEwFMtHRZTiFLk > NOkqv328xsqJy1smKgfFI4cpNMa1+Be0zGjqRWjBFNTqWEoNPkAbDbhbiwYPZYop > CW0lDS6b6dc2KCMcxlP+3BwuFC+pS9Yw/Qw2B0yceVjrH0YnLoVkOaqC6ojGx6DH > JAFtJLB6FbXssbK3JASOvGKpMxcktfQe3quJZmTaMY2yLkBaomA= > =8MfO > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Happy to contribute. maybe we can have a direct conversation so that we can discuss what is needed and where I feel comfortable... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to email@example.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/134582e1-f89b-47d3-8176-68de4fd88851%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.