R-sig-phylo was once a place to discuss phylogenetics in R.

It�s now a place to get ads from Physalia, PR Statistics, Transmitting Science, 
and Instats about courses and seminars they are offering (most paid, though not 
all). Some of the ads are relevant for using R in phylogenetics; many are not. 
But the listserv is now over 78% ads from these four organizations (more stats 
at https://brianomeara.info/posts/rsig/); only 4% of the most recent threads 
were about actual questions on using R for phylogenetics. It�s even worse in 
other listservs; in June, 2025, ALL 28 threads in the r-sig-ecology listserv 
were announcements of this sort 
(https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-ecology/2025-June/thread.html), so this 
is definitely a strategy these organizations have chosen to adopt.

There IS interest and value in a lot of the advertised courses, but it�s a 
different interest � in the same way R in finance could be important but only 
marginally overlaps with phylogenetics, so it would not be great if the vast 
majority of r-sig-phylo posts were about day trading. Perhaps it is time for 
these organizations to create an r-sig-courses or similar listserv, or use one 
of the many tools available for running a mailing list dedicated to potential 
customers of their organizations.

We�re living in an era where a lot of online forums are potentially going to be 
full of AI-generated inauthentic comments; a working email forum could be 
valuable as a place for humans to talk to other humans, as this one has been in 
the past. That�s not going to be possible if people flee because it is now used 
as a marketing list.

Hilmar Lapp, our very long-serving, volunteer, list moderator, posted something 
similar months ago ( 
https://www.mail-archive.com/r-sig-phylo@r-project.org/msg06067.html ) with 
some generous guidelines that allow some posting (most of the orgs have still 
posted in excess of this). Like him, I do see cases where a course posting 
could be relevant, so I�m reluctant to say we should ban all course 
announcements, but I think it could be worth having a rule like this at this 
point. Though maybe the organizations involved could try to listen to a plea 
from the community and choose to stop instead of putting yet more work on our 
mod.

Thanks,
Brian


        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

_______________________________________________
R-sig-phylo mailing list - R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
Searchable archive at http://www.mail-archive.com/r-sig-phylo@r-project.org/

Reply via email to