Peter Kourzanov scripsit: > > Peter, the better way to do the kind of thing you are looking for > > is PARAMETERIZE. I wouldn't advocate it for CASE, though. > > Any pointers? Or is it the PLT/Racket thing?
SRFI 39. -- John Cowan co...@ccil.org http://ccil.org/~cowan I must confess that I have very little notion of what [s. 4 of the British Trade Marks Act, 1938] is intended to convey, and particularly the sentence of 253 words, as I make them, which constitutes sub-section 1. I doubt if the entire statute book could be successfully searched for a sentence of equal length which is of more fuliginous obscurity. --MacKinnon LJ, 1940 _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list r6rs-discuss@lists.r6rs.org http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss