On Fri, 2010-12-24 at 12:26 -1000, Shiro Kawai wrote: > > So, RRS's (fluid) redux (or shall I say Rabbit redux). Its so > > well-hidden I didn't know it existed. Any plans on going back > > that for R7RS? > > Is SRFI such an obscure, hidden thing? Admittedly, referring to > individual srfi by number is a bit forbidding for newcomers, but > I've been thinking that popular(*) SRFIs are indispensable for > those who consider using Scheme seriously.
This particular one is: there are 3 SRFI's with keyword "parameter", 26, 39 and 89, each with its own meaning of "parameter". Why wasn't this one just called "dynamic binding" or "back to fluids"? > > I'd prefer having a small core standard and rich SRFIs, but > opinions may differ. Me too. Now if they were also named consistently... > > (*) Which SRFI is popular? This is a bit outdated, but you can > get an idea: http://practical-scheme.net/wiliki/schemexref.cgi/SRFI That's a useful link, thanks! _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list r6rs-discuss@lists.r6rs.org http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss